Steve Jobs believed that design was more about the way things work, not the way they look. Apple has gone on to become the world's most valuable brand with that philosophy.
To get a better idea of how these approaches translate to real life, let's say you and a few prospective customers decide to take a road trip, as a relationship building exercise.
SEO-centric of course decides to stay home, because the trip does not include a visit to Google headquarters. If Google and Bing aren't the focus of the journey, why should he waste the time.
User-centric obsesses over the comfort of the passengers, so they’ll be very happy they made the trip, and consider coming along on the next one. She thoughtfully brings along some magazines and bottles of water.
ROI-centric carefully maps out the most efficient route, checks tire pressures and suggests taking a car with better fuel economy. Cost of customer acquisition is weighed against buying another round of snacks at the convenience store.
Meanwhile, Client-centric only cares that the colour of paint and leather of the SUV you'll be traveling in matches well with the colour palette fan she brought along.
From my perspective, as a content marketer, getting someone into the vehicle in the first place — or creating your audience first — would have to be the most important. Without it, there would be no trip even to consider. 🙂
A growing number of conscientious web designers are coming to the realization that the client-centric approach is extremely short sighted, self-serving, and fundamentally flawed from the outset. Rendering the decision maker’s creative vision becomes the only thing that matters… to the exclusion of almost everything else. Very rarely does this approach bring any value to the audience. And without an audience, you will be unable to influence the decisions of future buyers and sellers.
I believe that many designers who won’t fight for the website’s users, or even the company’s balance sheet, are equally self absorbed. These designers have realized that a “give the customer what they want” approach is the shortest, least stressful, path to sign-off and final payment. They know many of their clients' choices will come back to bite them in the ass later, but they say nothing, or at best, make mention of it once in passing.
The return on investment design approach embodies user experience, creation of useful content, SEO and a conversion strategy. In other words, designing for profit covers all the bases but one. Chasing aesthetics, and delivering a very specific look and feel that satisfies one individual, or a small group of them, often conflicts with a far nobler purpose. Including all the features the site's owner wants can be equally harmful to the user experience, slowing the site to a crawl with code bloat. The best web designers design for the client's client.
Are you of the persuasion that the customer is always right? They are, after all, paying for the work and should be making the design decisions. Right!?!?
Or would you agree that, as Google and Facebook have concluded, function trumps aesthetics? Audience engagement and response decide the value of the website. And the true beauty of a site is revealed in an impressive return on investment.
Cole Wiebe helps brands and professionals grow their influence and value online; so they can “out content”™ their competition. Cole is a content strategist, content writer, conversion copywriter and online marketing coach.
Related Articles
Real Estate Marketing Tips Blog
Cole,
I would have to say that I believe the customer is always right. I think that web design should be done to attract the most visitors and hence create the most revenue.
You can make the most beautiful website ever but if it does not help make a profit then it is not worth much.
Great post.
Dee Ann
Hi Dee Ann,
Thanks for your input. I'm all for giving the customer what they want aesthetically, as long is it doesn't conflict with the job they hired me to do: increase search engine results, traffic and the number of leads they get from their website.
For example: Requests like a dozen huge, full-width slider images on the home page, and a long list of features that require a lot of JavaScript, will slow the site to a snail's pace. User experience will absolutely suck, and they could even be suspended by the hosting company.
I've seen sites rate with a pair of D's on GTmetrix.com as a result of fulfilling client requests. Google won't rank a resource hog like that anywhere near the top. No rankings = no traffic = no sales. That's a problem. In situations like that, I'm effective to the degree I am able to convince them their "design" ideas are killing them.
You're so right... a pretty site that doesn't increase profits is a waste of server space. Or as I like to say: "How important is the 'design' on a site nobody ever visits?"
- Cole
Cole its been a while since I landed on your site, and I must say as an individual the best design should take into consideration ROI.
Thanks for making the concept easy to understand. That's what I love about your approach to writing.
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the kind comments. Having just read your latest post, The Irresistible Power of Story Telling Businesses, I can see we have a similar approach, generally including at least one story to illustrate a point.
- Cole
I have been online since the early nineties and have changed my website many times. I would ask my customers what would make their experience better? I still ask that question and continue to make the changes. Now to stay up with my competitors, it doesn't matter how beautiful your site is if it can't be seen, so one should never forget SEO.
Hi Arleen,
I'm with you there. As David Ogilvy used to say, "Award winning creative, without eyeballs, never sold a damn thing."
- Cole
I have always advocated the user centric approach (focusing on the user experience; provide a memorable experience and there is a higher chance that the user will come back).
But, the way you explained this makes sense, especially for design. If we are blogging for business (or blogging to promote our business), ROI is important, even essential.
I have been working on improving my blog (most of it is still behind the scenes, a lot more things to do before I implement those changes). So, this blog post is very much timely for me 😀
Now that I think about it, I am getting ideas on how I would improve my blog - to get more results (in my case, more traffic and more subscribers).
Thank you for sharing this, Cole!
Appreciate it 🙂
Hi Jeevan,
The ROI-centric approach addresses search engine rankings, the user experience when visitors arrive, and converting visits into revenue over time.
Best of luck in continually improving the design and content on your blog. Over the years I've seen many of my favorite blogs and websites vanish for lack of revenue. Quite a few of those authors felt that blogging for "money" was somehow ethically wrong. (One declared it "vulgar.") Had they taken care of their bottom line, they'd probably still be providing their readers with high quality information. I dearly wish they had. I believe it's Robert Herjavec who said, "If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing for money."
- Cole
I think user centric web design is most effective. If our clients like the design and they love to come in our blog, that's all what we need. On the other hand seo centric web design is not so easy to achieve.
Hi Pankaj,
I'm with you there. If the user experience sucks, visitors won't return, and there will be little hope of a return on investment.
Putting return on investment first, out of necessity, addresses SEO, traffic flow, an enjoyable user experience, affective presentation of useful content, social media integration, and a conversion strategy that puts money in the bank. The only consideration that gets very little attention is whether the clients were able to fully express themselves artistically in the finished website.
- Cole
Hi Cole,
I'm enjoy web design and learn more and more about it all the time. When I look at these 4 approaches, for the most part aren't they all considered equal?
The customer is absolutely always right! I think a healthy blend is the most effective approach. The client centric sets you apart from them many other sites in your niche. The user centric is important for engagement, conversions etc. The SEO and ROI centric go hand in hand, as far as, credibility and being found online. All are important and none of them should be neglected?
Thanks for this Cole.
Hi Steven,
I'm going to have to disagree with you. Sadly, most web design customers look to other sites for their design and marketing ideas. We have the blind leading the blind, because statistics indicate that over 95% of all websites fail the only place it matters, on the bottom line. These sites will cost the client more to build and maintain than they will ever recover in new business revenue. The customer is usually dead wrong when it comes to designing their website. And if they are permitted to run roughshod over a designer that knows better, that online marketing professional has failed the client spectacularly.
If a trial attorney permits the client to discard a tried and proven approach for winning the case, and map out her own defense, he is not behaving as a professional at all if he adopts a "customer is always right" philosophy. The case will almost certainly be lost in court, and his client will likely face years in prison, or be liable for financial damages that could bankrupt her. That irresponsible attorney should be disbarred.
A heart specialist will not dismiss years of medical training and hands-on experience, in favor of directions from the patient, when performing open heart surgery. A malpractice suit will surely follow the procedure if the customer is permitted to take over.
The stakes are just as high in online marketing. Sales are the lifeblood of any company, and businesses die every day because their websites failed to generate leads. If we fail our clients, the consequences can be dire. Who honestly cares if customers received the exact look and feel they wanted, as they're closing the doors and terminating the jobs of their entire staff?
It's time internet marketing professionals provided real value and took their advisory roles more seriously. The projected upside must exceed the cost of the re-design, or there will be no return on investment.
- Cole
Hi,
People willing to come to your site to be a part of your services you offer to them. A great practice of end-users with your site will absolutely assist them to retain your offers and vice-versa.
Return on investment is equally the same you earn from your valuable customers by offering them yours rich set of services. An online presence onto web precisely transact with pure organic web traffic(customers) you have, dominating to your site.
Rest of approaches are also applicable but only with distinct aspects of business.
Thanks for sharing.
Having the perfect mix is hard to find, but it's most ideal. I think there are a lot of good thoughts here. Thank you so much for sharing these ideas!
When you’re creating a site, your job is to get rid of the question marks the decisions users need to make consciously, considering pros, cons and alternatives. helpful post.
A web designer is required to keep in mind the target audience and the brand image while designing the site. keep posting.